I know voice calls (and especially video) can make people uncomfortable, but my dad sees it this way:
If you see their face, you'll know right off the bat if they're 50-year-old stalkers or not.
Doesn't make me uncomfortable, and as far as I can tell, face reveals don't even faze the BCC members (why couldn't you guys have just come all the way over to CA Downtown Disney instead??).
But some other users don't seem to like the idea. If need be they could always chill in the hangout's chatbox, though...
Doesn't matter to me, either.
If it's simply face, they could choose not to use their cam or if it's just it all together they could simply use the chatbox.
Why? I mean, I would find it uber-annoying, but then you get to feel smug when you acquire technology/powers that allow hypersonic flight and you deliberately cause sonic booms above everyone.
Because, it's tedious, annoying, it basically makes everything too tedious even the slightest action would be boring and more. I am firmly against.
Doesn't make me uncomfortable, and as far as I can tell, face reveals don't even faze the BCC members (why couldn't you guys have just come all the way over to CA Downtown Disney instead??).
But some other users don't seem to like the idea. If need be they could always chill in the hangout's chatbox, though...
Doesn't matter to me, either.
If it's simply face, they could choose not to use their cam or if it's just it all together they could simply use the chatbox.
If it's simply face, they could choose not to use their cam or if it's just it all together they could simply use the chatbox.
Same, I'm pretty much fine with anything.
I'm not quite so comfortable with it, to be honest. Your logic makes sense, Keplers, but then I wouldn't like to have my face out on the internet either.
I'm not quite so comfortable with it, to be honest. Your logic makes sense, Keplers, but then I wouldn't like to have my face out on the internet either.
Which is reasonable for all it's worth. Just to prove I'm otherwise (which may be very foolish or very brave or maybe just stupid), I'mma post my face right here for everyone to bask near.
I'm not quite so comfortable with it, to be honest. Your logic makes sense, Keplers, but then I wouldn't like to have my face out on the internet either.
Which is reasonable for all it's worth. Just to prove I'm otherwise (which may be very foolish or very brave or maybe just stupid), I'mma post my face right here for everyone to bask near.
Nice - foil? Sabre? Épée? I'm not particularly familiar with fencing.
Still, I'm not so certain. I prefer to be cautious, even conservative, about this sort of thing.
Which is reasonable for all it's worth. Just to prove I'm otherwise (which may be very foolish or very brave or maybe just stupid), I'mma post my face right here for everyone to bask near.
Nice - foil? Sabre? Épée? I'm not particularly familiar with fencing.
Still, I'm not so certain. I prefer to be cautious, even conservative, about this sort of thing.
Again, a fair opinion. Who knows what the repercussions of my display shall be?
And it would be a saber. The manliest of the weapons, of course.
Nice - foil? Sabre? Épée? I'm not particularly familiar with fencing.
Still, I'm not so certain. I prefer to be cautious, even conservative, about this sort of thing.
Again, a fair opinion. Who knows what the repercussions of my display shall be?
And it would be a saber. The manliest of the weapons, of course.
Not quite sure if you're being sarcastic, but you actually have a point. The internet is a nebulous, chaotic place - one of the better elements of the LEGO Message Boards is the fact that it is secure against these things.
Meh. Give me a gladius and scutum any day - though the fact that you appear to be left-handed might cause me some problems if there were to be a battle between the two of us.
Again, a fair opinion. Who knows what the repercussions of my display shall be?
And it would be a saber. The manliest of the weapons, of course.
Not quite sure if you're being sarcastic, but you actually have a point. The internet is a nebulous, chaotic place - one of the better elements of the LEGO Message Boards is the fact that it is secure against these things.
Meh. Give me a gladius and scutum any day - though the fact that you appear to be left-handed might cause me some problems if there were to be a battle between the two of us.
Aye, it is and that was.
I am left-handed. Bring your Roman equipment any day, and I'll skewer you with my thin, flexible, thrust-dominant blade! Alternatively I pack a good ol' Mauser and win at fifty yards.
Not quite sure if you're being sarcastic, but you actually have a point. The internet is a nebulous, chaotic place - one of the better elements of the LEGO Message Boards is the fact that it is secure against these things.
Meh. Give me a gladius and scutum any day - though the fact that you appear to be left-handed might cause me some problems if there were to be a battle between the two of us.
Aye, it is and that was.
I am left-handed. Bring your Roman equipment any day, and I'll skewer you with my thin, flexible, thrust-dominant blade! Alternatively I pack a good ol' Mauser and win at fifty yards.
Not sure which two of the three elements of the two sentences you are confirming there.
Charging forward scutum-first might help with that. Of course, your being left-handed doesn't help... I suppose that holding a shield in my left hand won't be too big of a disadvantage. Once I've closed sufficiently the sabre will be far too unwieldy to use - my gladius, on the other hand, will be absolutely perfect.
I am left-handed. Bring your Roman equipment any day, and I'll skewer you with my thin, flexible, thrust-dominant blade! Alternatively I pack a good ol' Mauser and win at fifty yards.
Not sure which two of the three elements of the two sentences you are confirming there.
Charging forward scutum-first might help with that. Of course, your being left-handed doesn't help... I suppose that holding a shield in my left hand won't be too big of a disadvantage. Once I've closed sufficiently the sabre will be far too unwieldy to use - my gladius, on the other hand, will be absolutely perfect.
Armoured engines of war are cheating.
They were in respective order.
Aha! But the saber functions perfectly well at close-quarters – it is offense that is the only issue. The Maus and Mauser are different. One is a tank, one is a pistol.
Not quite sure if you're being sarcastic, but you actually have a point. The internet is a nebulous, chaotic place - one of the better elements of the LEGO Message Boards is the fact that it is secure against these things.
Meh. Give me a gladius and scutum any day - though the fact that you appear to be left-handed might cause me some problems if there were to be a battle between the two of us.
Aye, it is and that was.
I am left-handed. Bring your Roman equipment any day, and I'll skewer you with my thin, flexible, thrust-dominant blade! Alternatively I pack a good ol' Mauser and win at fifty yards.
I am actually very proficient with chains and a Scythe.
Don't judge me.
I am actually serious, I could probably beat both of you
I am left-handed. Bring your Roman equipment any day, and I'll skewer you with my thin, flexible, thrust-dominant blade! Alternatively I pack a good ol' Mauser and win at fifty yards.
I am actually very proficient with chains and a Scythe.
Don't judge me.
I am actually serious, I could probably beat both of you
I am actually very proficient with chains and a Scythe.
Don't judge me.
I am actually serious, I could probably beat both of you
Except I am accurate with a gun.
Useful thing, that. Then again, I know (theoretically, at least) how to operate several kinds of ancient artillery. I shall laugh at you as I bombard you with ballista bolts from a nearby hill at a range at which your gun is ineffective.
Useful thing, that. Then again, I know (theoretically, at least) how to operate several kinds of ancient artillery. I shall laugh at you as I bombard you with ballista bolts from a nearby hill at a range at which your gun is ineffective.
Useful thing, that. Then again, I know (theoretically, at least) how to operate several kinds of ancient artillery. I shall laugh at you as I bombard you with ballista bolts from a nearby hill at a range at which your gun is ineffective.
Hmmm... at what range? I could find myself with a K98 rather than a Mauser C96 (changing the equipment, I know). I could hypothetically then fire at you whilst you loaded the ballista, or even aimed it.
I'm not quite so comfortable with it, to be honest. Your logic makes sense, Keplers, but then I wouldn't like to have my face out on the internet either.
My mouth got onto the internet once or twice... :3